| Area | Leader | Farming system |
|---|---|---|
| Luxor Governorate, Egypt | CIHEAM IAMM | Sugarcane and cereal monoculture, livestock and diversified systems |
| Main productions and value chains | Main issues | |
| Sugarcane and cereal monoculture, livestock and diversified systems. | Environmental: Extreme weather events, droughts, low soil quality, soil salinity Economic: currency depreciation, market instability, import dependency Social: malnutrition, poverty, internal conflicts | |
Sugarcane Farms
Sugarcane farms are specialized systems focusing on maximizing their production. Farmers typically engage in contract farming with sugar and molasses factories, selling the production at a standard by-back price. This results in strong monoculture, with an average area of 2.04 ha, of which around 70% is allocated to sugarcane. A small plot is used for wheat production to be self-consumed, and farmers keep a limited number of large livestock (cows and buffaloes). Labor is mainly hired, especially during the harvesting period. However, despite their intensive production, these systems exhibit the lowest use of phytosanitary products among the identified dominant farm types.
Livestock Farms
Livestock farms focus on the production of crops as fodder to feed their animals. Their profitability is based on the selling of animal products, while 10%-20% is self-consumed in the household. Farmers often hold secondary off-farm jobs, typically as government officials. The average land holding is around 0.98 ha, with crop pattern based on wheat, maize, clover and sorghum, with occasionally a small plot of land with sugarcane. Their herds consist of large animals such as cows and buffaloes, alongside 10 to 12 monogastric animals (sheep or goats) and poultry They rely heavily on hired labour, while a 20% of total labour comes from the family.
Diversified Farms
Diversified farms focus on the production of various crops to cover the needs of the household. The average holding is around 1.12 ha, consisting of wheat, maize, sorghum and clover. Approximately, 80% of the production is for self-consumption while the remaining 20% is sold to the local market. Regarding livestock, farmers maintain a small number of monogastric animals and poultry. As for the crops, the animal products are also used for self-consumption with the surplus been sold. For the labour, the farmers rely on average 75-80% on the family, while the rest is hired workers. Overall input use is of medium intensity, but the phytosanitary products are high, reflecting farmers’ efforts to protect crops and ensure a reliable food supply for the household.
Cereal Farms
Cereal Farms are the smaller farms in the LL, with an average land holding size of 0.63 ha. Farmers are primarily focused on covering household needs, with the only source of income being a contract on 5% of the wheat production. The cropping pattern is based on wheat and maize, with occasional small plots of clover. No livestock, apart from poultry, is present which limits household dietary options. Additionally, these farms rely exclusively on family labour to carry out all agricultural activities. Overall, the input use is low, however the use of phytosanitary is high, as farmers seek to protect their crops.
The agroecological transition scenarios were co-designed together with the living labs through workshops that anchored the discussion in the challenges present in their territory. Consequently, they decided which agroecological practices, and which combinations of them, to promote the change in their farming systems. The AEP selection and scenario design comprised two different workshops focusing on the selection of agroecological practices aligned with the local context. First, a farmers’ workshop was conducted to design and select the agroecological practices they were willing to implement in the living lab, grounding the discussion on existing challenges. Subsequently, a representative board’s workshop was conducted, where representative board members examined the selected agroecological practices chosen by farmers, assessed their combinations, and identified additional practices.
| Name | Improved Varieties |
|---|---|
| Summary | Improved, yet local, varieties will be used for cereal crops (wheat and maize). These provide resistance to drought and soil salinity, while ensuring nitrogen absorption. |
| Full description | Most of the crops are cultivated in intensive monoculture systems. These systems are vulnerable to weather extremes, crop failure and water scarcity. In addition, there is a yield drop of 6% on average due to climate change. |
| Technical details |
Yield
Yield will increase by 10–15%, countering the 6% loss caused by climate change.
Labour
Labour needs will increase by 10–15% on average.
Fertilizers
Fertilizing inputs will increase by 15%, as these varieties require more nutrients to maximize yields.
Seeds
A government subsidy will be responsible for providing the seeds, respecting the validated variety map that has been issued.
Hypotheses and Scenarios
Hypothesis: providing seed subsidies will encourage farmers to adopt improved varieties, in order to secure food and income despite higher input and labour costs.Scenario 1a: use of improved varieties with seed subsidies. Scenario 1: use of improved varieties and drip irrigation. Combination Scenario 2: use of improved varieties and raised bed cultivation. Combination |
| RF1 | Baseline | RF2 | Baseline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crop Pattern | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Land Use | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Pesticide Use | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Nitrogen Leaching | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| RF1 | Baseline | RF2 | Baseline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Farm Income | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Name | Drip Irrigation |
|---|---|
| Summary | Change the current flood irrigation system to drip irrigation. |
| Full description |
The majority of farmers in the Living Lab use a flood irrigation system, which involves overfilling their plots until the soil reaches saturation. This makes the systems susceptible to increased soil salinity and, in the long run, threatens to cause water scarcity. Water scarcity in the region is already approaching absolute scarcity levels. Changing to a drip irrigation system can therefore regulate the amount of water used in the agricultural systems, and the efficiency with which it is used. |
| Technical details |
Yield
Yield will increase by 30%.
Water
Water use will be reduced by 40% compared to the current amount.
Labour
Labour needs will increase by 30%, specifically for fertilization, phytosanitation and harvest.
Costs
Overall costs will increase by 30%, due to the installation and depreciation expenses of the new irrigation system.
Hypotheses and Scenarios
Hypothesis: financial subsidies for installation costs, combined with penalties for non-compliance with the National Drip Irrigation Initiative, will encourage farmers to switch systems.Scenario 1b: installation of a drip irrigation system. Scenario 1: use of improved varieties and drip irrigation. Combination |
| RF1 | Baseline | RF2 | Baseline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crop Pattern | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Land Use | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Pesticide Use | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Nitrogen Leaching | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| RF1 | Baseline | RF2 | Baseline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Farm Income | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Name | Raised Bed Cultivation |
|---|---|
| Summary | Formation of elevated plots of land (beds) for cultivating the crops. |
| Full description | While a small percentage of farmers already use it, it is not widely perceived as an agro-ecological practice. Raised beds protect the fields from soil erosion, maintain water retention and improve water use efficiency. |
| Technical details |
Yield
Yield will increase by 30%.
Water
Water use will be reduced by 25% compared to the current amount.
Labour
Labour needs will increase by 40%, specifically for fertilization, phytosanitation and harvest.
Costs
Overall costs will increase by 30%, due to creating and maintaining the beds.
Hypotheses and Scenarios
Hypothesis: providing government assistance for land levelling, together with seed subsidies, will encourage farmers to adopt raised bed cultivation.Scenario 2b: raised bed cultivation. Scenario 2: use of improved varieties and raised bed cultivation. Combination |
| RF1 | Baseline | RF2 | Baseline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crop Pattern | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Land Use | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Pesticide Use | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Nitrogen Leaching | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| RF1 | Baseline | RF2 | Baseline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Farm Income | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Name | New Sugarcane Cultivars |
|---|---|
| Summary | Replacing the current cultivation material (cuttings) with seedlings. |
| Full description | The cultivation of sugarcane is traditionally done using plant cuttings supplied by public factories. Transitioning to seedlings allows for a shorter cultivation cycle (approximately three months less) without compromising yield. |
| Technical details |
Yield
The cultivation period will drop by three months, without compromising yield.
Labour
Labour will increase, because of the new three-month window available for cultivating another crop.
Inputs
Input use will increase, due to the additional crop.
Seeds
Requires 50% more seed per hectare, due to the higher number of seedling plants needed.
Hypotheses and Scenarios
Scenario 3: replacing the current cultivation material (cuttings) with seedlings.
|
| RF1 | Baseline | RF2 | Baseline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crop Pattern | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Land Use | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Pesticide Use | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| Nitrogen Leaching | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
| RF1 | Baseline | RF2 | Baseline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Farm Income | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM | Information to be provided by CIHEAM |
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut blandit justo a commodo rutrum. Suspendisse ornare turpis eget cursus varius. In id fermentum mi. Aenean porta sodales sapien, id consectetur dui egestas vel. Donec quis accumsan mauris, nec consectetur erat. Integer eu ipsum nec lectus ultricies dictum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut blandit justo a commodo rutrum. Suspendisse ornare turpis eget cursus varius. In id fermentum mi. Aenean porta sodales sapien, id consectetur dui egestas vel. Donec quis accumsan mauris, nec consectetur erat. Integer eu ipsum nec lectus ultricies dictum.